DevTools VS

Bootstrap vs Bulma

Updated Jun 28, 2026

Quick Verdict

Bootstrap has 3.5x more GitHub stars, while Bootstrap has 14.7x more weekly downloads.

GitHub Stars
Bootstrap 174.4K
vs
Bulma 50.1K
Downloads/wk
Bootstrap 5.2M
vs
Bulma 355.4K
Contributors
Bootstrap 1.7K
vs
Bulma 431
Bundle Size
Bootstrap 16.3 KB
vs
Bulma N/A

Bootstrap

Website

The most popular CSS framework for responsive web design

csscomponentsresponsivegrid

Bulma

Website

Modern CSS framework based on Flexbox

cssflexboxresponsivemodular

Detailed Comparison

Side-by-side metrics from GitHub and npm

Metric
Bootstrap
Bulma
GitHub Stars
174.4K
50.1K
Weekly Downloads
5.2M
355.4K
Forks
78.8K
3.9K
Open Issues
277
523
Contributors
1.7K
431
Bundle Size (gzip)
16.3 KB
N/A
Dependencies
0
0
Latest Version
5.3.8
1.0.4
Last Commit
Jun 28, 2026
Mar 1, 2026
License
MIT
MIT
First Published
Aug 28, 2011
Jan 27, 2016

Download Trends

Weekly npm downloads over the past 52 weeks

Feature Comparison

Framework capabilities at a glance

Feature
Bootstrap
Bulma
Utility Classes
Components
Theming
Responsive
Dark Mode
Tree Shaking
Typescript

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Bootstrap vs Bulma

Is Bootstrap better than Bulma?

It depends on your use case. Bootstrap is the most popular css framework for responsive web design, while Bulma is modern css framework based on flexbox. Compare the stats and features above to decide which fits your needs.

Is Bootstrap still maintained in 2026?

Yes, Bootstrap was last updated on June 28, 2026 and has 1,653 contributors.

Can I migrate from Bootstrap to Bulma?

Migration complexity depends on how deeply Bootstrap is integrated into your project. Both tools serve similar purposes in the CSS Frameworks space, so migration is generally feasible with proper planning.

Related Comparisons

Explore more comparisons