DevTools VS

Ant Design vs shadcn/ui

Updated Mar 4, 2026

Quick Verdict

Both Ant Design and shadcn/ui are popular choices in the CSS Frameworks space.

GitHub Stars
Ant Design 97.6K
vs
shadcn/ui 107.7K
Downloads/wk
Ant Design 2.9M
vs
shadcn/ui N/A
Contributors
Ant Design 2.7K
vs
shadcn/ui 465
Bundle Size
Ant Design N/A
vs
shadcn/ui N/A

Ant Design

Website

Enterprise-class React UI design language and components

reactenterprisecomponentsdesign-system

shadcn/ui

Website

Beautifully designed, copy-paste React components built on Radix and Tailwind

reactradixtailwindcopy-paste

Detailed Comparison

Side-by-side metrics from GitHub and npm

Metric
Ant Design
shadcn/ui
GitHub Stars
97.6K
107.7K
Weekly Downloads
2.9M
N/A
Forks
54.5K
8.0K
Open Issues
1.4K
1.8K
Contributors
2.7K
465
Bundle Size (gzip)
N/A
N/A
Dependencies
48
N/A
Latest Version
6.3.1
N/A
Last Commit
Mar 4, 2026
Mar 3, 2026
License
MIT
MIT
First Published
Jun 23, 2015
Jan 4, 2023

Feature Comparison

Framework capabilities at a glance

Feature
Ant Design
shadcn/ui
Utility Classes
Components
Theming
Responsive
Dark Mode
Tree Shaking
Typescript

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Ant Design vs shadcn/ui

Is Ant Design better than shadcn/ui?

It depends on your use case. Ant Design is enterprise-class react ui design language and components, while shadcn/ui is beautifully designed, copy-paste react components built on radix and tailwind. Compare the stats and features above to decide which fits your needs.

Is Ant Design still maintained in 2026?

Yes, Ant Design was last updated on March 4, 2026 and has 2,671 contributors.

Can I migrate from Ant Design to shadcn/ui?

Migration complexity depends on how deeply Ant Design is integrated into your project. Both tools serve similar purposes in the CSS Frameworks space, so migration is generally feasible with proper planning.

Related Comparisons

Explore more comparisons