DevTools VS

Ant Design vs Bulma

Updated Mar 4, 2026

Quick Verdict

Ant Design has 2.0x more GitHub stars, while Ant Design has 11.2x more weekly downloads.

GitHub Stars
Ant Design 97.6K
vs
Bulma 50.1K
Downloads/wk
Ant Design 2.9M
vs
Bulma 257.2K
Contributors
Ant Design 2.7K
vs
Bulma 431
Bundle Size
Ant Design N/A
vs
Bulma N/A

Ant Design

Website

Enterprise-class React UI design language and components

reactenterprisecomponentsdesign-system

Bulma

Website

Modern CSS framework based on Flexbox

cssflexboxresponsivemodular

Detailed Comparison

Side-by-side metrics from GitHub and npm

Metric
Ant Design
Bulma
GitHub Stars
97.6K
50.1K
Weekly Downloads
2.9M
257.2K
Forks
54.5K
3.9K
Open Issues
1.4K
520
Contributors
2.7K
431
Bundle Size (gzip)
N/A
N/A
Dependencies
48
0
Latest Version
6.3.1
1.0.4
Last Commit
Mar 4, 2026
Mar 1, 2026
License
MIT
MIT
First Published
Jun 23, 2015
Jan 27, 2016

Download Trends

Weekly npm downloads over the past 52 weeks

Feature Comparison

Framework capabilities at a glance

Feature
Ant Design
Bulma
Utility Classes
Components
Theming
Responsive
Dark Mode
Tree Shaking
Typescript

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Ant Design vs Bulma

Is Ant Design better than Bulma?

It depends on your use case. Ant Design is enterprise-class react ui design language and components, while Bulma is modern css framework based on flexbox. Compare the stats and features above to decide which fits your needs.

Is Ant Design still maintained in 2026?

Yes, Ant Design was last updated on March 4, 2026 and has 2,671 contributors.

Can I migrate from Ant Design to Bulma?

Migration complexity depends on how deeply Ant Design is integrated into your project. Both tools serve similar purposes in the CSS Frameworks space, so migration is generally feasible with proper planning.

Related Comparisons

Explore more comparisons