DevTools VS

Bulma vs Material UI

Updated Mar 4, 2026

Quick Verdict

Material UI has 2.0x more GitHub stars, while Material UI has 30.6x more weekly downloads.

GitHub Stars
Bulma 50.1K
vs
Material UI 98.0K
Downloads/wk
Bulma 257.2K
vs
Material UI 7.9M
Contributors
Bulma 431
vs
Material UI 3.4K
Bundle Size
Bulma N/A
vs
Material UI 145.3 KB

Bulma

Website

Modern CSS framework based on Flexbox

cssflexboxresponsivemodular

Material UI

Website

React UI component library implementing Material Design

reactmaterial-designcomponentstheming

Detailed Comparison

Side-by-side metrics from GitHub and npm

Metric
Bulma
Material UI
GitHub Stars
50.1K
98.0K
Weekly Downloads
257.2K
7.9M
Forks
3.9K
32.7K
Open Issues
520
1.7K
Contributors
431
3.4K
Bundle Size (gzip)
N/A
145.3 KB
Dependencies
0
12
Latest Version
1.0.4
7.3.8
Last Commit
Mar 1, 2026
Mar 3, 2026
License
MIT
MIT
First Published
Jan 27, 2016
Sep 2, 2021

Download Trends

Weekly npm downloads over the past 52 weeks

Feature Comparison

Framework capabilities at a glance

Feature
Bulma
Material UI
Utility Classes
Components
Theming
Responsive
Dark Mode
Tree Shaking
Typescript

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Bulma vs Material UI

Is Bulma better than Material UI?

It depends on your use case. Bulma is modern css framework based on flexbox, while Material UI is react ui component library implementing material design. Compare the stats and features above to decide which fits your needs.

Is Bulma still maintained in 2026?

Yes, Bulma was last updated on March 1, 2026 and has 431 contributors.

Can I migrate from Bulma to Material UI?

Migration complexity depends on how deeply Bulma is integrated into your project. Both tools serve similar purposes in the CSS Frameworks space, so migration is generally feasible with proper planning.

Related Comparisons

Explore more comparisons